'No Jab, No Pay' policy has biggest impact in lowest SES areas


Tuesday, 06 October, 2020

'No Jab, No Pay' policy has biggest impact in lowest SES areas

The national ‘No Jab, No Pay’ policy has been linked to substantial catch-up vaccination activity, with some of the biggest changes observed in the lowest socio-economic status areas and for Indigenous Australians. The researchers, from the University of Sydney and the National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance (NCIRS), have published their findings in the Medical Journal of Australia.

The policy was introduced on 1 January 2016, extending the existing vaccination requirements for receiving federal family assistance payments by removing non-medical (conscientious objection) exemptions and tightening guidelines for medical exemption.

The current research analysed data from the Australian Immunisation Register on catch-up vaccination rates for:

  • children aged 5 to less than 7 years before (January 2013 to December 2014; baseline) and during the first 2 years of No Jab, No Pay (December 2015 to December 2017); and
  • children aged 7 to less than 10 years and young people aged 10 to less than 20 years (No Jab, No Pay period only).
     

The researchers examined catch-up vaccination rates for the second dose of measles-mumps-rubella vaccine (MMR2) in the latter two age groups, by Indigenous status and socio-economic status, and for the third dose of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine (DTPa3) and the first dose of the measles­-mumps-rubella vaccine (MMR1) in children aged 5 to less than 7 years, before and after the introduction of No Jab, No Pay.

The proportion of incompletely vaccinated children aged 5 to less than 7 years who received catch-up DTPa3 was higher under No Jab, No Pay than during the baseline period (15.5% vs 9.4%); however, a slight reduction in MMR1 catch-up was also found (13.6% vs 12.9%).

Of 407,332 incompletely vaccinated adolescents aged 10 to less than 20 years, 71,502 (17.6%) received catch-up MMR2 during the first 2 years of No Jab, No Pay.

This increased overall coverage for this age group from 86.6% to 89.0%. MMR2 catch-up activity in this age group was greater in the lowest socio-economic status areas than in the highest socio-economic status areas (29.1% vs 7.6%), and also for Indigenous compared with non-Indigenous Australians (35.8% vs 17.1%).

“Our findings suggest that, while monetary sanctions are effective in promoting catch-up vaccination, their impact varies with socio-economic disadvantage,” concluded the authors, led by Dr Frank Beard, NCIRS Associate Director, Surveillance, Coverage, Evaluation and Social Science, and Senior Lecturer at the University of Sydney.

“Moreover, the lack of change in MMR1 catch-up activity in children aged 5 to less than 7 years suggests little impact on those who reject vaccination, and that expansion of age requirements was the more effective policy lever in this period,” Dr Beard said.

Co-author Professor Julie Leask, NCIRS Professorial Fellow and University of Sydney expert on vaccination attitudes and behaviour said, “Many factors contribute to incomplete vaccination; a comprehensive suite of measures, particularly for reducing barriers to access and incorporating systematic reminders, is therefore essential for improving coverage. Requirements alone are not enough.

“The full scope of consequences of strict vaccination requirements should be carefully examined by any country considering such measures. It may be possible to find a reasonable middle ground that increases catch-up while not disadvantaging certain families.”

Image credit: ©stock.adobe.com/au/goodluz

Related News

Virus samples missing from Qld lab, investigation launched

Queensland Health will conduct an Investigation into a major breach at the state's Virology...

Small weight gains can increase back pain, disability risk

A study linking body composition and back pain in men has found that as little as three kilograms...

Certain hormone treatments linked to increased heart disease risk

Specific hormone replacement therapy (HRT) treatments involving both oestrogen and progestogen...


  • All content Copyright © 2024 Westwick-Farrow Pty Ltd