ACCC Institutes Proceedings Against Reckitt Benckiser

By Petrina Smith
Thursday, 05 March, 2015


The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has advised it  has instituted proceedings in the Federal Court of Australia against Reckitt Benckiser (Australia) Pty Ltd (Reckitt Benckiser) regarding its Nurofen Specific Pain products.
The ACCC alleges Reckitt Benckiser made false or misleading claims that its Nurofen Specific Pain Products Nurofen Back Pain, Nurofen Period Pain, Nurofen Migraine Pain, and Nurofen Tension Headache were each  formulated to treat a specific kind of pain, when the products are identical.
The ACCC is making it an enforcement priority to address truth in advertising and consumer issues in the health and medical sectors in 2015. It  recently released its Compliance and Enforcement Policy which identified truth in advertising and consumer issues in the health and medical sectors as key areas of priority for 2015.
“The ACCC takes false or misleading claims about the efficacy of health and medical products very seriously,” ACCC Chairman Rod Sims says.
The ACCC alleges that Reckitt Benckiser made representations on the packaging of each Nurofen Specific Pain Product, and on its website www.nurofen.com.au(link is external), that each product:


  • was designed and formulated to treat a particular type of pain;

  • had specific efficacy in treating a particular type of pain; and

  • solely treated a particular type of pain.


The ACCC alleges that these representations were false or misleading because the caplets in all four Nurofen Specific Pain Products are identical and each contain the same active ingredient, ibuprofen lysine 342mg. All four products are also approved on the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods as being suitable for treating a wide variety of pain types.
“In this case, we allege that consumers have been misled into purchasing Nurofen Specific Pain Products under the belief that each product is specifically designed for and effective in treating a particular type of pain, when this is not the case,” Mr Sims says.
“The retail price of the Nurofen Specific Pain Products is significantly above that of other comparable analgesic products that also act as general pain relievers. Recent price sampling conducted by the ACCC revealed that these products are being sold at retail prices around double that of Nurofen’s standard ibuprofen products and standard products of its competitors.”
The ACCC is seeking declarations, injunctions, an order for the publication of corrective notices, penalties and costs.
This matter is listed for a case management conference on 31 March 2015 in the Federal Court of Australia in Sydney.
 
Related Articles

Losing our minds — an AU$85bn phenomenon

There is a storm brewing, largely unnoticed: the convergence of two high-prevalence, high-impact...

Upholding a new model of mental health care

The Ipswich Hospital Mental Health Acute Inpatient Service was recently recognised at the...

Enhancing hearing loss diagnostics and outcomes in primary care

Hearing health is integral to overall physical and emotional wellbeing, yet it often remains...


  • All content Copyright © 2024 Westwick-Farrow Pty Ltd