Thrush treatment caution for women in first trimester
Researchers have advised caution in prescribing oral fluconazole to women in their first trimester of pregnancy after finding that pregnant women taking the drug orally appeared to have an increased risk of giving birth to a baby with muscle and bone malformations.
However, the research published by The BMJ revealed that the absolute risk is small and there is no association between taking the treatment and babies having heart defects or oral clefts.
Vulvovaginal candidiasis, commonly known as thrush, is common in pregnant women and the recommended treatment is usually a short course of topical antifungal agents or one dose of oral fluconazole (150 mg).
Although the topical antifungal treatment is available over the counter in many countries, oral fluconazole is often preferred by patients because of the convenience of taking one oral dose.
Previous studies have suggested that high doses of fluconazole can be harmful and cause cleft palate and skeletal abnormalities, while use of the treatment carries an additional potential risk of congenital malformations in babies of women who take them during the first trimester of their pregnancy. However, findings from these studies have been inconsistent.
US researchers therefore set out to examine the risk of congenital malformations associated with exposure to oral fluconazole from commonly used doses in women taking it during the first trimester of pregnancy to treat thrush.
Using data from the nationwide Medicaid Analytic eXtract (MAX) database, the researchers identified pregnant women aged 12 to 55 who were continuously enrolled in Medicaid from three or more months before the last menstrual period to one month after delivery, and infants enrolled for three or more months after birth.
The study group of 1,969,954 pregnancies included 37,650 (1.9%) pregnancies exposed to oral fluconazole and 82,090 (4.2%) pregnancies exposed to topical antifungal treatment during the first trimester.
Results showed that the risk of musculoskeletal malformations was 52.1 per 10,000 pregnancies exposed to fluconazole compared with 37.3 per 10,000 pregnancies exposed to topical treatment.
Using oral fluconazole in the first trimester was not found to be associated with oral clefts or heart defects (conotruncal malformations).
However, the risk of musculoskeletal malformations was double in women taking the highest dose in early pregnancy (above 450 mg), though absolute risks were still small (12 incidents per 10,000 exposed pregnancies overall).
There was also a 30% increased risk amongst women who had taken a smaller cumulative dose of 150 mg of oral fluconazole.
“Our study confirmed an increase in the risk of musculoskeletal malformations if fluconazole is used during the first trimester, and refuted large increased risks of conotruncal malformations, oral clefts, and other specific types of malformations,” the researchers wrote.
“Oral fluconazole during the first trimester, especially prolonged treatment at higher than commonly used doses, should be prescribed with caution, and topical azoles should be considered as an alternative treatment.”
Despite several study limitations — the number of outcomes for the least common malformations was relatively low, the researchers were unable to determine if the dispensed drug was consumed, and there were unmeasured or poorly measured variables such as obesity, which could have accounted for the increased risk — the study had a large sample size. Pharmacy prescriptions were used to calculate exposure and generated evidence more applicable to clinical decision-making, with careful control for a broad range of potential confounding variables and sensitivity analyses to address the concerns about unmeasured confounding.
New public health campaign to improve pregnancy outcomes
The Preterm Birth Prevention campaign 'See, Stop, Scan' aims to promote engagement...
Feedback sought on genomic-led cancer control
The framework is designed to guide health professionals, researchers, health services and policy...
Can you die from long COVID? The answer is not so simple
Nearly five years into the pandemic, COVID is feeling less central to our daily lives.